Labels
- Garden (23)
- My people (17)
- Wild things (13)
- Eastern Cape (12)
- Life (11)
- Recycling (7)
- Ambles (5)
- Food (5)
- Handmade (4)
- Technology (4)
- Reinvention (2)
- Slow fashion (2)
- Sustainable living (2)
- Writing (1)
Sunday, 24 November 2019
Friday, 15 November 2019
Freeing ourselves from supporting harm
Could giving up buying new clothes be the biggest personal
change you can make for the environment? That’s what The Guardian asked in an article on
the growing number of people moving away from fast fashion to second-hand
clothing. I came across it after I’d vowed to not buy new clothes for a year.
I did some research and so did the members of the group. Everything I learned convinced me it was the right thing to do – and that this could indeed be the biggest personal change a consumer can make to lessen harm on the environment and the people who live, and work, in it. Presumably, if you are doing this, you are already living in a way that is good to the environment.
Why on Earth did I think this might be a frivolous thing to do? The New York Times gave me a clue: “Clothes are easy to ignore because they are made far away and have throughout history been made by enslaved, unpaid and low-paid laborers, often by women. But clothing affects every other environmental problem we care about.”
The seed for that was planted by an 18-year-old. I’d
remarked to her that there were far more second-hand than new clothing shops on
the streets of a Cape Town suburb. She swept her hands over her jeans and
mohair cardigan. “Everything I am wearing is second-hand,” she said. She explained that buying used clothes not only saves her money; it also makes her feel good
because it is better for the Earth. She opened my eyes. So when fires raged
through the Amazon and forests of Africa, I knew what to do: I decided to not buy
new clothes for a year. It made me feel less helpless.
Cautiously – was this regarded as frivolous? – I shared my
decision in a Facebook post. Immediately, a handful of people joined me and we set
up a Facebook group called
“We’re not buying new clothes for a year” to support each other and share
experiences.
I did some research and so did the members of the group. Everything I learned convinced me it was the right thing to do – and that this could indeed be the biggest personal change a consumer can make to lessen harm on the environment and the people who live, and work, in it. Presumably, if you are doing this, you are already living in a way that is good to the environment.
The damage that fast
fashion does
There’s a heap of information
out there, but here’s a good summary of the issues. Follow the links if you want to discover more. In a nutshell:
- The fashion industry produces 10% of all humanity’s carbon
emissions – more than all international flights and maritime shipping
combined.
- It’s responsible for 20% of all industrial water pollution and is
the second-largest consumer of the world’s water.
- The throwaway habits around fast fashion lead to the equivalent of a garbage truck full of clothes being burned or dumped in a landfill every second.
Why on Earth did I think this might be a frivolous thing to do? The New York Times gave me a clue: “Clothes are easy to ignore because they are made far away and have throughout history been made by enslaved, unpaid and low-paid laborers, often by women. But clothing affects every other environmental problem we care about.”
My research led me to
Extinction Rebellion, or XR, which pushes for peaceful, radical environmental
action. XR is driving a global movement to “#BOYCOTTFASHION” for 52 weeks (it caused a bit commotion at the London Fashion Week this year). “There is no
fashion on a dead planet,” it tweeted. We produce up to 100 billion pieces of
clothing a year, “taking a terrible toll on the planet and people who make
them”.
Consumers are choosing
to remove their support for an industry that does harm to people and the
environment. The choice to stop buying new, for whatever period, is
being seen as a powerful form of activism against the damage that harmful
consumerism, particularly of fast fashion, does to the environment.
How do we do it?
How easy is it to stop
buying new clothes for a year? I like the term, “circular fashion”, which CBS News uses to distinguish from
“conspicuous consumption”. It means “extending the lifecycle of well-made
garments and recycling their materials into new items”.
XR has some advice too:
“There is an abundance of clothing and textiles already in circulation which we
can creatively repair, re-use, alter, upcycle, recycle and much more,
minimising our use of new resources. We encourage rebels to share through
swapping or renting, or buying and selling second-hand.”
The clothing exchanges I’ve
held in my garden every eight months or so take on new meaning. We call these
feel-good events Clothes with Karma. I’ll explain more about these events –
they are fun and easy to organise – in later posts. And I’ll explore other ways
you can manage just fine without buying new clothes.
Inspirational people
The Facebook group,
steadily growing, is a source of inspiration – on why and how to stop buying new clothes and what
it means for each of us. Members include men and women and people across the
globe. I suspect commitment varies: some people have not bought new for years; some
(like me) are just starting out; some are being more conscious of how and what
they buy. They are united by a conviction to take a stand against harmful,
thoughtless consumption. They are insisting there is another way.
Here's what some members
say:
- Melanie Farrell (Cape Town) puts it like this: “When I was working fulltime, buying clothes was a way of distracting myself from how much I hated the job. Now that I’m freelance, I still have a wardrobe full of ‘distraction dresses’ and piles of things that I've never worn. The psychology of shopping is interesting, but a bit disturbing too.”
- Victoria Whisson (London) says she “committed shopping” to self-medicate when she was desperately unhappy. “I believed shopping gave me some control – a sense of having choices – when I felt trapped by my situation. Now, of course, I realise that what I was actually doing was the opposite of being in control.”
- Angela Tuson (East London, South Africa) decided to not buy, eat or consume any animal products or products of sweatshops. “I feel happier and, strangely, more stylish and coordinated,” she says. “I didn’t realise that thoughtless buying was making me feel burdened until I stopped.”
Redefining
Just three months into my no-new-clothes journey,
it’s already redefining my relationship with clothes – which I love – and with
how I spend my money. Even with a few additions found in charity shops, I
have fewer clothes in my wardrobe now: as I rediscover treasures in its depths,
I pass on things I have not been wearing. My shopping trips for essentials are
quicker, more focused and not as heavy on the wallet as they were. I feel
lighter, freer.
When/if I buy new clothes again, I
shall choose good-quality items from local designers and brands that I
know use sustainable production. By then, it will be a habit to reduce, reuse,
recycle and be more creative with what I have. I’ve just discovered a term for
it: slow fashion, based on the impact of an item’s
production on people and the environment. It’s about buying less but better,
buying local. It’s about being mindful; it’s about getting back to basics.
Thursday, 14 November 2019
It’s a 7 thing
Seven. It shows up everywhere,
from major religions to popular book titles. Naturally, the days of the
week, the wonders of the world, the continents of the Earth and the colours of
the rainbow are arranged into seven. It’s the
prime prime number, truly. (Be still, spell check. The repetition is
intentional.)
And now it’s time. I’ve
missed writing for the sheer pleasure of it and hopefully sharing something useful
or thought provoking at the same time.
So here’s my big seven: it’s
been seven years since I last wrote a post on this blog. There
are no excuses – although I could try to not take responsibility for just
being tardy by blaming that tendency to over-busyness that may have disrupted my work-life balance. I won’t. It’s a precarious thing, the work-life
see-saw. And you wouldn’t really want to keep it permanently level, would you?
What kind of see-saw keeps steady? Only a very boring one that none of us would
want to play on.
New beginnings: The journey starts with embracing reinvention |
Some things have
changed in seven years. Blogging advice, for example. Back then, the predominant
advice was to keep posts as short as possible and to publish as often as
possible. Now, apparently, the ideal length of a blog post is 1,600 words, which will take
seven minutes to read, because readers are more likely to engage in it.
Luckily, the experts still see value in shorter posts, a minimum of 300 words.
And they advise publishing quality, not quantity. That part makes sense.
And people change;
they evolve. I have changed to become far more focused on sustainable living,
finding ways to be kind to the Earth. It’s critical, actually, that we do this.
Our home is in big trouble. And so are we.
Some things haven’t
changed, like the name of this blog. I did consider wiping the slate clean and
starting again. But for me, everything comes back to
the milkwood tree/s in my forest garden – its survival on our damaged Earth. The
milkwood (I wrote about it here) is a symbol of what I hope to get across, which focuses on recycling
and reuse and reinvention of you and me and the things in our lives.
If you’ve read this far (barely more than 300 words), then
you’ll realise that the subject matter of Under
the milkwood is shifting from post-corporate life to using our own power to
make choices in our own lives to stop harming the Earth and hopefully to even see some
recovery. But we don't exist in boxes. So I'll share places and people and my ongoing battle to keep that see-saw gently rising and falling.
Join me for the journey.
Join me for the journey.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)